The Bokeh is very good for travel and simple portrait shots. It is not comparable to an RF 85mm f/1.2 L prime lens, but it got me some sharp portraits with a decent background blur. Here are some shots at 35mm at f/4 and f/2.8 from the RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS US vs the f/4 on the EF 24-70mm f/4 L IS USM. Rattray Head Comparison 35mm EF 24-70 at f4.
Compare Canon RF 24-70mm f 2.8 L IS USM Lens vs Canon RF 24-105mm f 4 L IS USM Lens vs Canon EF 24-70mm f 2.8L II USM Lens vs Canon EF Weight . 1.98 lb / 900 g 6. It depends what you mean by "better". The Canon 24-105mm f/4 IS L has image stabilization of around 3 stops. The Canon 70-200mm f/4 L lens has no image stabilization but a similar f/4 aperture. If you are simply interested in hand-holdability then the 24-105mm is superior due to it's image stabilization feature. I would only recommend the RF 24-70 if you're a professional shooter. It's heavy and big, especially on the RP (it's more balanced on the larger bodied R6), and its ridiculously expensive. It has fantastic image quality, but Canon really did well with the RF 24-105 f4, and most people can't tell the difference between images created with the two.1. The two shots with the baby and the little girl were shot with FF bodies. The 24-105 may work on portraits ( due to being up close) but there have been mixed reviews about using EF lenses on crop bodies. As someone said the 85mm range would be best for portraits on a crop. Kent.6Flv7Rm.
